II. Before the Assessment
In this section, there is a discussion on what firms can do to prepare for a technology assessment to ensure efficiency and mitigate potential roadblocks.
Securing Funding
Firms can expect that a technology and security assessment done by a vendor will cost approximately $35,000 to $75,000, depending on the size of the organization and the services requested. This estimate accounts for the payment to the vendor and does not include costs of managing the assessment within the organization (e.g., funds for staff participation, a project manager, meeting time, etc.). This is a sizeable, though necessary, investment; thus, most firms apply for funding outside of their usual channels. Below are a few options to pursue when trying to find funding.
LSC’s Technology Improvement Project Grant (TIP)8
The Legal Services Corporation (LSC) has funding available for certain LSC grantees9 to support technology infrastructure improvement projects. According to LSC, this award is “intended to provide funding for appropriate consulting services to conduct a technology assessment, information security audit, business process improvement, or technology planning process.” The maximum amount of these grants is $35,000. Project funding is for either 12 or 18 months. Applications are available on GrantEase, which is LSC’s online grant management system. Applications historically have been due in May. See the TIP Category Application Guide for more information.
Other Grantor Funding
Non-LSC funded organizations and organizations requiring more funds than the $35,000 available through TIP grants will need to look for other sources of funding for their technology assessments. The following resources may be helpful in the search for funding:
-
IOLTA: State-based Interest on Lawyer’s Trust Accounts--- or IOLTA--- is a program adopted in the early 1980’s that uses the pooled interest collected on lawyer’s trust accounts to fund a variety of civil legal aid causes. More information on IOLTA funding can be found at https://iolta.org/ A list of IOLTA programs by state may be found at https://iolta.org/program-directory/#us-programs .
-
Cy Pres and State Bar Foundations: Cy Press distributions are residual funds in class action cases that are unclaimed or unallocated for any number of reasons. These funds may then be distributed by the courts to appropriate charitable causes, including legal aid organizations, under the Cy Pres doctrine. Cy Pres awards are often awarded to state bar organizations who may allocate this funding to civil legal programs.
-
State and local government: Firms seeking additional funding should contact their state bar organization for more information on grants and available funding.
-
NLADA: The National Legal Aid & Defender Association (NLADA) is a non-profit organization dedicated to increasing legal aid agency’s access and capacity to “apply for, receive, and manage federal grant programs that target low-income populations and allow legal services to fulfill program goals.” In an effort to build legal aid capacity to secure federal grant funding, NLADA has developed a resource list featuring federal grant opportunities for legal aid programs which can be found at https://legalaidresources.org/ .
How to Prepare for a Technology Assessment
After securing funding and selecting a vendor but before beginning a technology assessment, it is recommended to do the following:
-
Identify a project team.
-
Prepare a priority/needs assessment.
Each of these steps will be discussed in-depth below.
Identify a Project Team
A technology assessment is a significant undertaking. Organizations should prepare by identifying select staff or designating a project team that will be made available throughout the process to guide the assessment, make decisions, and help the vendor access the information and resources needed to complete a successful assessment. As part of identifying a project team, some organizations may benefit from forming a technology committee or leveraging an existing one. (However, in some programs, small staff size, limited capacity, or other challenges could mean a technology committee would not be feasible or a prudent use of staff time).
The Tech Committee
Forming a technology committee involves bringing together individuals with diverse expertise to guide technology decisions, strategies, and implementations, and to bring forth staff technology needs. If the firm already has a technology committee, this group is a good place to start for planning the tech assessment. If the firm does not have a technology committee, one should be convened. Keep in mind that the group can be scaled up or down depending on the size and needs of an organization. The tech committee should be comprised of the following staff:
-
CIO/vCIO or CTO: The firm’s Chief Information Officer (CIO), virtual Chief Information Officer (vCIO), or Chief Technology Officer (CTO) is responsible for overseeing the firm’s overall technology strategy, infrastructure, and operations.
-
IT Manager/Director: This IT professional is responsible for managing the day-to-day IT needs of the firm. Many firms have an IT Director or a CIO/vCIO/CTO but may not have both.
-
Upper Management/Administration: A high-level representative of the firm’s leadership can provide insights into the firm’s strategic goals, business priorities, and financial considerations.
-
Practice Area Representatives: Attorneys from different practice areas can provide input on how technology aligns with the specific needs of each practice and how it can improve client service and case management.
-
Operations Manager: Staff from the operations team can monitor how technology fits in with the firm’s operations, workflows, and processes to ensure that it integrates seamlessly and enhances efficiency.
-
Financial Representative: If the upper management/administration representative does not have a solid understanding of the firm’s finances, it can be helpful to have someone from the finance team who can provide input on budgeting, cost-effectiveness, and the financial implications of technology decisions.
-
Compliance Officer: A member of the compliance team can weigh in on grant and funder requirements as well as firm needs surrounding data privacy and security.
-
Support Staff: Support staff, including legal assistants, paralegals, and secretaries should be included on the committee to provide insights into existing needs and challenges.
-
Change Management Specialist: If the firm has a staff member responsible for change management, this person should be included to manage the transition to new technologies, ensuring the staff adapt to these changes smoothly and effectively.
-
“Tech/Computer Responsible People”: Many firms have one or more tech or computer responsible people (“TRP”s or “CRP”s) from each office to assist with technology troubleshooting within the office if there is no IT staff on site. These individuals should be included on the tech committee to represent the IT needs of each office.
Creating a well-rounded tech committee comprised of key staff from each of the areas of expertise listed above ensures that decisions will be made that benefit all areas of an organization. Technology assessments— before, during, and after— may impact the function of each of these departments. Including key staff in the decision-making process ensures that changes are implemented smoothly and effectively.
The Project Manager
While the technology assessment vendor should have a solid project management plan available at the beginning of the project, an internal project manager should be appointed to ensure the availability of firm resources and to guide the project through to a successful outcome. This person can be the point of contact with the vendor and should be responsible for the following:
-
Planning and Scope: The project manager should work with the internal team and the vendor to monitor the scope, objectives, and deliverables for the project. The project manager should also be involved in helping the vendor create a detailed project plan that outlines tasks, timelines, milestones, and responsibilities.
-
Resource Allocation: The project manager should be responsible for ensuring that the appropriate resources are available for the project. These resources include personnel, tools, and budget.
-
Coordination: The project manager should act as the central point of contact between the internal assessment team, the vendor, and other stakeholders.
-
Timeline Management: The project manager should ensure that the project stays on track and help identify potential delays.
-
Risk Management: The project manager can identify potential risks and challenges that might arise during the assessment and develop strategies to mitigate these issues.
-
Documentation: The project manager should work with the vendor to oversee the documentation of changes to internal processes that will come out of the assessment.
-
Stakeholder Engagement: The project manager should engage with key stakeholders within the firm to elicit input and ensure any concerns are considered throughout the assessment.
For more information on Project Management, see LSNTAP’s Project Management Toolkit.
Prepare a Priority/Needs Assessment
Once a project team is identified, organizations should consider conducting a priority or needs assessment to identify and highlight organizational goals for the technology assessment. Although technology assessment projects may include surveying staff to gather feedback on technology, training needs, and pain points, this preparatory step will lay the foundation for a successful technology assessment process and ensure that the technology assessment project scope aligns with the identified goals and priorities.
Rather than a needs assessment that focuses on substantive issues or client populations, a priority/needs assessment in this context (i.e., preparing for a technology assessment) focuses on the organization’s goals and objectives to improve its delivery of legal services and the use of technology to serve clients. When engaging in a technology assessment project, this type of information would be useful to communicate with vendors during the project kickoff or when scoping the project.
A sample technology self-assessment is below. Firms should review the information below ahead of a formal technology assessment and can also use the tool to do reviews in between formal assessments.
Technology Self-Assessment for Legal Aid Providers11
Instructions:
-
For each area, assess your current technology status.
-
Outline specific actions and strategies for improvement in each area.
-
Identify the areas with the most urgent needs and prioritize them for immediate attention.
-
Develop an action plan for technology enhancement and allocate resources accordingly.
-
Regularly revisit this assessment to track progress and adapt to changing needs.
Area of Assessment |
Sub-Area |
Considerations |
IT Infrastructure |
|
|
Hardware |
|
|
|
Software |
|
|
Network |
|
|
Security12 |
|
|
Data Backup |
|
Case Management System |
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
Integrations |
|
Document Management |
|
|
|
Document Storage |
|
|
Version Control |
|
|
Collaboration Tools |
|
Legal Research Tools |
|
|
|
Access to Legal Databases |
|
Client Communication |
|
|
|
Email Encryption |
|
|
Secure Client Portal |
|
|
Virtual Meetings |
|
Cybersecurity |
|
|
|
Employee Training |
|
|
Firewall and Antivirus |
|
|
Incident Response |
|
IT Budget and Planning |
|
|
|
Budget Allocation |
|
|
Technology Roadmap13 |
|
Compliance and Regulation |
|
|
|
Compliance regimes: Rules of Professional Conduct, GDPR, etc. |
|
Policies and Plans |
|
|
|
User Policies |
|
|
Business Continuity Business Recovery |
|
|
Incident Response Plan |
|
|
Data Retention Destruction Policy |
|
|
Onboarding and Offboarding Policies |
|
|
Security Policies |
|
8. Legal Services Corporation. (n.d.). Technology Initiative Grant Program. https://www.lsc.gov/grants/technology-initiative-grant-program
9. Grantees of LSC Basic Field-General, Basic Field-Migrant, or Basic Field-Native American grants that are not subject to short-funding (less than one year) on the basic field grant award. https://www.lsc.gov/grants/technology-initiative-grant-program/how-apply-technology-initiative-grant
10. See ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (competence), 1.6 (confidentiality), 5.3 (non-lawyer legal assistance).
11. DISCLAIMER: This technology self-assessment tool has been developed as a resource to assist law firms in evaluating their technology infrastructure and practices. It is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a professional opinion. Use of this tool does not create an attorney-client relationship with LSNTAP or Just-Tech, LLC. The information provided should not be construed as legal advice or a substitute for consulting with qualified professionals. Technology landscapes are constantly evolving. The information provided may not reflect the most up-to-date best practices or requirements. This tool is used at one’s own risk and LSNTAP and Just-Tech, LLC. make no warranties or representations regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of the tool for any particular circumstance.
12. See LSNTAP’s Legal Aid Security Toolkit
13. A technology roadmap is a strategic tool used by organizations to outline their technology-related goals, objectives, and initiatives over a specific period. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162503000726?via%3Dihub
14. See ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (competence), comment 8.